COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|3 Months Ended|
Mar. 31, 2018
|Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]|
|COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES||
NOTE 12– COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
On June 14, 2017, the company entered into a five-year lease with LLC1 for approximately 6,944 square feet and a monthly rent of $12,000.
Future principal payments for the Company’s portion are:
Rent expense for the three months ended March 31, 2018, and 2017 was $36,000 (related party and $18,372 ($1,500 related party), respectively.
On August 5, 2016, the Company along with Mark Moore (“Mark”, the Company’s chairman), Matthew Moore (“Matthew”, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer) and Kim Moore (“Kim”, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer) entered into a Store Expansion Consulting Agreement (the “Expansion Agreement”) Mark, Matthew and Kim are herein referred to collectively as the Moores. Pursuant to the Expansion Agreement, the Company and the Moores were responsible for all physical plant and marketing details for new store openings during the initial term of six-months. The Expansion Agreement was cancelled on January 6, 2017. The Company’s client has decided to do their own marketing in-house and eliminate this out-sourced contract and has decided to delay the opening of any new stores. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company has received and recognized $160,000 in other income, net, for payments received for the cancellation of the Expansion Agreement.
Also on August 5, 2016, the Company and the Moores entered into a Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with the same party as the store Expansion Agreement. Under the Consulting Agreement, including the Non-Compete provision covering a ten- mile radius of any retail store, the Company and the Moores were to provide unlimited licensing of the Intela-Hear brand name, exclusive access to the Aware Aural Rehab Program within 10 miles of retail stores, exclusive territory of all services within 10 miles of retail stores and 40 hours per month of various consulting services. The Consulting Agreement was to continue until January 31, 2019, unless terminated for cause, as defined in the Consulting Agreement. On May 2, 2017, the Company received a demand letter threatening litigation unless all monies paid pursuant to the Consulting Agreement are returned. On May 26, 2017, a complaint (the “Complaint”) was filed against the Company and the Moores, which includes a request for rescission of the Consulting Agreement. The Company believes the Complaint by the third party is frivolous and without merit, as well as not providing sufficient cause for the Agreement to be terminated. The Company has filed a countersuit against this third party for breach of contract so that it may recover the amounts owed under the Consulting Agreement, however, effective January 1, 2017, the Company has not recognized revenue from the Consulting Agreement, and accordingly, $847,223 is classified as deferred revenue on the condensed consolidated balance sheets presented herein.
Effective December 1, 2017, the Company entered into a one-year Marketing Services Agreement (the “MSA”). Pursuant to the terms of the MSA, the Company will receive consulting and advisory services regarding the implementation of marketing programs, including the design and creation of commercial websites and commercialization of products through social media or other marketing methods. The Company will pay consideration for the services of $5,000 cash and $5,000 of common stock each month. The Company will issue the number of shares of common stock equal to a twenty-five percent (25%) discount to the lowest closing price of the common stock for the five (5) last trading days of the common stock for that month. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company recorded $15,000 of consulting expense and recorded $7,778 of stock-based compensation expense (pursuant to the terms of the MSA) from the issuance of 111,111 shares of common stock. The Company also recorded 266,401 shares of common stock to be issued as of March 31, 2018, and recorded stock- based compensation expense of $17,184 (pursuant to the terms of the MSA). Lastly, on February 27, 2018, the Company issued 102,564 shares of common stock that were previously recorded as common stock to be issued.as of December 31, 2017.
On May 26, 2017, Helix Hearing Care (California), Inc. a California corporation (“Helix”), filed a complaint (the “Complaint”) against the InnerScope and the Moores, in the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, that includes a rescission of the Consulting Agreement and a demand that all monies paid pursuant to the Consulting Agreement be returned, on the basis that an injunction against certain Officers and Directors renders the Consulting Agreement impossible to perform. The Company had previously received $1,250,000 under the Consulting Agreement. InnerScope was not named as an enjoined party in such previous litigation, and the services contemplated under the Consulting Agreement are not within the scope of the injunction, thus InnerScope believes the accusation by the third party is frivolous and without merit, as well as not providing sufficient cause for the Agreement to be terminated.
InnerScope and the Moores filed their Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Complaint on June 27, 2017. On the same date, InnerScope, the Moores, and MFHC filed a counterclaim. On February 27, 2018, the Counterclaim was amended to include four claims for breach of contract, one claim for anticipatory breach of contract, one claim for negligent misrepresentation, and one claim for account stated. The parties have also sent each other written discovery requests and have served written responses to the same.
The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies.
Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef